You CAN Change: You Better Believe It

You really can change.

The research evidence supports that people really can and do change. We all know people who have stopped harmful habits such as smoking even though all smokers admit that it is very difficult to quit.

It’s important that you believe in your own ability to change.

We encourage you to do what you can to support your self-confidence, your faith in yourself, and your hope for the future. If you can’t choose to believe that you can change, then at least reserve your judgment, set aside any negative beliefs, and approach the process of change with an open mind.

Don’t fall into the self-fulfilling prophecy trap.

That is, if you predict something, you will tend to make that thing happen. Believing that you can’t change undermines your motivation, effort or willingness to try and leaves you with only the cold comfort and trivial reward of being right when you fail.

Failing to change only proves that you have not yet mastered the skills or built enough motivation.

Change is difficult. Change requires strategies, preparation, and knowledge that you might not have yet. Perhaps you have repeatedly tried something that does not work for you rather than trying a new, different approach. Realizing that there are many paths to change brings hope.

Change is usually difficult, but not impossible.

Your genetics and your upbringing do not determine your behavior. Biology is not destiny. Neither can your history hold you totally in its grip. Even your current environment does not totally control you, though altering or leaving your current environment may make changing your behavior easier.

Change is a process, not an event.

You should keep in mind that change does not happen in a flash. Change may start with a flash of awareness, but it continues as a journey. And as with a journey, you had better be prepared to weather the difficulties and set backs that come along the way.

Setbacks are learning experiences, not proof of failure.

We see slips and lapses as a chance for practicing new skills, not something to be ashamed of. Instead of using a relapse as an excuse to give up and put yourself down, use any setbacks as opportunities to better understand what went wrong and how things might be handled better the next time. Meet with your counselor and come to a meeting and talk about your slip/lapse, and let everyone help you learn from it.

You can solve your own problems.

This does not mean that it is easy to change, or that you are somehow weak, defective, or morally deficient if you have not already done so. Nor is it accurate to say that heredity and biology plan no role in the complex problem of addiction. But while blaming a disease might help some people to accept the existence of an addictive disorder or reduce the social stigma attached, it might also make them and you less confident and able to solve your own problems.
You can empower yourself.
Instead of laying all the blame for your addictive behavior problems on heredity and environment, why not empower yourself with the kind of beliefs which research has shown to be effective?

Try saying the following things to yourself, firmly and repeatedly, and then see how you feel:
Addictive behavior is a human problem with a human solution.
I don’t HAVE TO change, but I can sensibly decide that I WANT TO.
Lapses in the past do not prove that I will lapse forever.
I am not a moral degenerate for trying to be happy in stupid or self-defeating ways.
I am responsible for my thoughts, feelings, and behavior.
I feel and act the way I think based on what I believe.
I am the only one who can change my behavior. Others may help, but nobody can do it for me.
It takes hard work and practice, not miracles, to overcome addictive behaviors.
I may benefit from help, but ultimately it’s up to me.
I can change if I choose to, and I am willing to do the work and practice.



Persistence to create a more meaningful and rewarding lifestyle,
plus a belief in your natural ability to change problematic behaviors which are getting in the way,
are among the most important factors in recovery.

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

The ABC’s of REBT/Rational Emotive Behavioral Therapy

The ABC is a tool to help us gain awareness of our thoughts, perceptions and beliefs that cause us problems and unnecessary disturbance and suffering. It is an exercise that helps us to stop being victimized by our own thinking, and change that thinking with the goal of increasing peace of mind and creating healthier responses and behaviors.

A common example is the situation of some people’s behavior “make me angry.” This is a common way of expressing something and we hear it often, but, in fact, it distorts the situation it attempts to describe. A more accurate description of “some people make me angry” is, “I am upsetting myself over their behavior.” The difference between these two statements may not at first seem important. The reality is that another person’s behavior does not, in itself, cause your anger. They are simply behaving in a way that I am allowing myself to get angry about. My reaction is my responsibility, not theirs. If I allow myself to become enraged over someone else’s behavior over and over again, it’s like walking around with a big sign on my forehead that says, “Push here to aggravate.” Is this a helpful or useful response to others’ behavior?

REBT theory says that getting all worked up about someone else’s behavior is generally self-defeating, irrational and increases our own suffering and discomfort. The anger is based upon a faulty assumption that the other person SHOULD behave the way we want them to. In the real world, however, what we believe the other person SHOULD do is not necessarily what they DO. The reality is that we usually have no control over the behavior of others. They will do what they choose, and we ALWAYS have the choice of how we are going to respond (instead of simply reacting).

Because people are likely to continue to do what they do anyway, it seems then that it would make life a great deal easier if we didn’t get so angry about it and lose our own peace of mind. This is what REBT can help us accomplish in many situations. The missing part of the puzzle, and the really crucial part, is what WE THINK about what they do, and then learn to make a more conscious choice about how we respond.

For example, if we believe “they” MUST NOT do whatever they are doing, we are DEMANDING that they do things our way. Most of the time, it just isn’t possible to control other people’s behavior. This lack of control of other people’s behavior can make us feel frustrated, ineffectual, angry, desperate, hurt, enraged, and so on because we cannot translate the DEMAND that “they MUST NOT do that” into reality. The bottom line is that we are DEMANDING something that is not under our control.

REBT teaches us to shift our thinking from DEMANDING to PREFERRING. It is better for my well-being if I simply PREFER to get what I want than to DEMAND it. Once we downgrade the DEMAND to a simple PREFERENCE, the heat is turned down and we can function more effectively, and more than likely feel better as well.

The ABCs is an exercise used to analyze the situation and change our thinking about it so that without trying to change external reality, we can feel better about it. We’re not saying that we should never try to change someone’s behavior – sometimes that’s appropriate. It’s when we are making ourselves totally miserable over something we may have no control over that we can consciously choose a more realistic response in order to get more of what we want and less of what we don’t want.

Example of an ABC

Here’s an example of an ABC using the situation of drunken people making a lot of noise late at night in front of my house:

A = the Activating Event (what upset me?)

Drunken people outside making noise late at night

B = What are your thoughts/Beliefs about what happened in A? (Look for SHOULDS, MUSTS, DEMANDS, CAN’T STAND ITS)
They MUST be quiet.

I CAN’T STAND IT that they are making so much noise.

C = the Consequences of having these beliefs (B’s) about (A)

Anger, Insomnia, Wanting to have a drink

D = Disputing the irrational thought/beliefs in “B” by turning them into questions and answers.

How can anyone absolutely DEMAND that drunken people MUST NOT make any noise?

Where is that commandment written in stone?

E = Effective new thinking – substitute rational thinking instead of (B)

Drunken people often tend to be noisy. I would PREFER that they wouldn’t be so noisy, and I’d really like to go back to sleep. I’ll just put the pillow over my head and relax. If I can’t, I can always call 911 and make a complaint.

F = New Feelings that come from the new thinking (E)

Less upset and angry; able to go back to sleep.

G = Goal for the next time the same situation (A) happens

Focus on what is under my control.

Have PREFERENCES instead of DEMANDS.

H = Homework to help me achieve (G)

Get used to using the ABC

Practice Rational Emotive Imagery

Whenever you feel upset, writing an ABC can be a very effective exercise, and a way to start training your mind to think this way. You never know…you just might feel better. If you get into the habit, you will find yourself feeling better all the way around. When you first begin practicing the ABC’s, there are many reasons why it is best to write them down on paper. Take the time to do this – if you practice, the ABC’s will eventually become an automatic mental process.

Remember, this is a tool, not just a conceptual model. Success with this and other cognitive techniques is dependent on your actually doing ABC’s, and making them an integrated part of the way you think, feel and behave.

 


Posted in Editorial, Recovery | Leave a comment

Do I Have to Quit?

Do I Have to Quit?

Am I someone who has no choice? Do I have to quit?

There is no one who has to quit an addictive behavior. There may be many benefits to your quitting, it may be quite intelligent of you not to quit, and your behavior may kill you or ruin you or lead to your imprisonment if you do not, but it remains quite possible for you to continue on (just as many before you have done). Only you can make this decision, and presumably you will do so by examining the benefits of the addictive behavior and the benefits of stopping.

Denying choice and personal responsibility can lead to unnecessary upsets.

If you accept the notion that you are someone who cannot continue to do this, someone who has to stop, you are very likely setting yourself up to feel angry, resentful, left out, frustrated, depressed, irritated, bored, and so forth. If you are already using your addictive behavior to cope with various negative feelings, you may use it to cope with these also. To prevent these feelings, it is better to tell yourself what is really true: You can do this activity or use this substance and bear the consequences. The crucial question is whether you truly want to.

How do I handle those who confront me with powerlessness and deny choice?

Others may tell you that you have to stop or that you are “the kind of person who has to stop.” Despite a poor choice of words, they are actually attempting to express their concern for you and their fear that you are denying the extent of your problems. Unwittingly they may be creating more problems for you, because most of us react to not being given a choice by attempting to prove that we do have a choice. Unfortunately, this reaction leads back to more addictive behavior, which may not be what you truly want. So you may end up, as we say, “cutting off your nose to spite your face.” If someone insists that you have to stop, ask for the observations on which this conclusion is based. You can disagree with the conclusion, but still learn a great deal from the observations.

We usually reject labels as unnecessary and harmful.

You do not need to accept any label that anyone suggests to you. If someone asks if you are an addict, an alcoholic (or some other term), you can simply say, “No, I just thought my life would be better if I stopped, so I did.” If offered your substance or activity by someone, you might in all sincerity reply, “No thanks, I enjoy it too much!”
Thomas Horvath, Ph.D.

Posted in Editorial, Recovery | 1 Comment

The Double Demons of Depression and Addiction

 

A very most moving speech was given by former U.S. Senator George McGovern. He spoke eloquently about his daughterTerry, who had both alcoholism and depression. He gave a detailed account of all that he, his wife and many others did to help Terry recover, only to be shocked and saddened late one Decemberevening when a police officer and minister came to his home to tell the McGoverns that Terry was dead. She had gotten drunk, passed out in the cold and froze to death.

In a book he wrote to tell this story, simply titled Terry (1997), Senator McGovern provides a heart wrenching description of the life and tragic death of his beloved daughter. He wrote that Terry “was dealt a double cruel hand: the companion demons depression and alcoholism. They were demons that warred ceaselessly against the other aspects of her being-a warm and sunny disposition.” This book provides insight on the experiences of Terry as well as her family whose personal suffering was every bit as awful as Terry’s. The
book also shows how alcoholism combined with depression often worsens the course of recovery.

Addiction and depression are common comorbid conditions. The Epidemiologic Catchment Area study conducted by the National Institute on Health reported that almost one-third of individuals with depression had a co-existing substance use disorder at some point in their lives (Regier et al, 1990). The National Comorbidity Study found that men with alcohol dependence had rates of depression three times higher than the general population; alcohol dependent women had four times the rates of depression (Kessler et al, 1997). Studies of clinical populations also show high rates of these combined
disorders (Salloum, Daley & Thase, 2000; Daley & Moss, 2002). Many clients have recurrent major depression, dysthymia (a chronic form of depression) or both major depression and dysthymia, also called “double depression.”

Clients with addiction and depression often have other DSM IV diagnoses including bipolar, anxiety, personality or other addictive disorders. In one of our recent studies of 153 new clients seeking treatment at 6 different substance abuse clinics, clients had a mean Beck Depression Inventory of 18.8 (sd=13.0), which is in the moderate range, and a mean Beck Anxiety Inventory score of 23.3 (sd=21.8), which is in the moderate to severe range. Although
these clients were new admissions to substance abuse clinics, 31.4% were taking antidepressants; 10.5% mood stabilizers; 8.5% anti-anxiety medications; and 7.8% anti-psychotics.

Women often develop the mood disorder first while men frequently develop the addiction first. For many, these disorders become linked over time with symptoms of each worsening the other. These conditions are often chronic and must be managed over the long run.

Many studies and books document the adverse effects of addiction, depression or dual disorders on the family and its members (Daley, in press; Mondimore, 1999; Rosen & Amador, 1996; Yapko, 1999). Children of alcoholics or opiate addicts are at increased risk for substance abuse, conduct problems, anxiety disorders and mood disorders. Parental substance abuse underlies many family problems such as divorce, spouse abuse, child abuse and neglect, welfare
dependence and criminal behaviors (Daley & Miller, 2001). Children of depressed mothers are at increased risk for a psychiatric disorder; the prevalence of “multi-problem” children is over eight times higher among families with a depressed parent (Yapko, 1999).

Studies conducted by this author and colleagues at Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center show that clients with addiction and depression are at higher risk for suicidal and homicidal behaviors, poorer treatment adherence, higher relapse rates to either disorder, and higher re-hospitalization rates (Cornelius et al, 1997; Salloum et al, 1996; Daley & Zuckoff, 1998 & 1999).

In a quality improvement study of 140 outpatients (most with mood disorders and addiction), conducted in our clinic, clients rated the adverse effects of their dual disorders on their families as “serious.” Problems resulting from their disorders included emotional and economic burden for the family, neglect and abuse, irresponsibility, and loss of children to other relatives or Child Welfare Services (Daley & Salloum, 1996).

Professional treatment and involvement in recovery can make a significant positive impact on clients and their families in managing the disorders and improving the quality of life. There are many effective treatments for depression including interpersonal psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy and supportive counseling; anti-depressant medications; and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). There are also many effective treatments for addiction including behavioral therapies and counseling, and sometimes, the use of medications.

Treatment should be “integrated” and go beyond symptom reduction by helping the client engage in a recovery process (Daley & Thase, 2000). Recovery aims to help the client manage the disorders over the long-term by making changes in self and lifestyle and may occur in any of the major domains of functioning listed in Table 1 (Daley, 2000).

Following are important points to keep in mind regarding professional
treatment and recovery:

Assessment

Having either addiction or depression raises the risk of having the other disorder. Anyone with a clinical depression should be assessed for a substance use disorder. Conversely, anyone with a substance use disorder should be assessed for a depressive disorder. Establishing abstinence for several weeks or longer is often needed to accurately diagnosis depression.

Abstinence

While many depressive syndromes improve with abstinence from substance use, some clients continue to experience depressive disorders that require treatment. Sobriety does not guarantee improvement in mood, and some clients’ moods will worsen after they get sober. A client and family must accept that at best, partial recovery will occur if both disorders are not adequately addressed. A client cannot expect to get the full benefits of treatment for the depression if he or she continues to drink alcohol or use other drugs.
Nor can the substance use disorder be effectively treated if significant mood symptoms persist.

Adherence

As in all disorders, adherence to treatment is necessary in order to get the maximum benefit. Since dual diagnosis clients show worst treatment adherence rates compared to those with only one type of disorder, this issue should be considered when developing a treatment plan. Motivational, treatment induction and outreach efforts often help improve consumer adherence and impact positively on outcome (Daley & Zuckoff, 1998 & 1999; Kemp et al, 1998; Miller & Rollnick, 1991; Walitzer, Derman & Connors, 1999; Zuckoff & Daley, 2001).

Psycho/Social Treatments

There are many effective psycho/social treatments for addiction, depression and dual disorders (Daley & Moss, 2002). Depressions of low to moderate severity often respond to therapy alone while more severe cases require medications in addition to therapy. Many effective therapies for depression and addiction are described in clinical manuals; clinicians should become aware of these evidence-based treatments and integrate clinical strategies in their work with clients (eg., see McLellan et al, 2000; NIDA 1999 and 2000;
Sammons & Schmidt, 2001; Weissman, Markowitz & Klerman, 2000). The National Clearinghouse on Drug and Alcohol Information(NCADI) publishes free treatment manuals describing behavioral therapies found to be effective in clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). NIAAA has manuals on twelve-step facilitation therapy, motivational enhance therapy, and cognitive-behavioral coping skills training. NIDA has manuals on individual drug counseling, group drug counseling, cognitive-behavioral therapy, contingency management, relapse prevention and cue extinction. The
challenge for clinicians is to provide integrated treatment that addresses both the addiction and the depression.

Medications for Depression

Many effective medications are available for the treatment of depression, especially more severe, chronic or recurrent types. Although all types of antidepressants are effective, the newer SSRI’s have fewer side effects than others and are less lethal in overdose. Some clients require the addition of a second antidepressant or a mood stabilizer to effectively treat depressive symptoms. Maintenance pharmacotherapy is needed for clients with recurrent
major depression (Kupfer et al, 1992). The risk of recurrence decreases substantially for clients who remain on medications even after significant periods of remission for depression.

Medications for Addiction

Medications can help addicted clients safely and comfortably withdraw from the physical symptoms associated with dependence. There are several other uses for medications as well, but these are usually used in combination with counseling. The medications, which are fully FDA approved, are tools which enable an individual dependent upon alcohol or drugs to focus on the recovery process. The medications include naltrexone (ReVia), Vivitrol(r) (injectible naltrexone)  ondansetron (Zofran), and Campral for alcohol dependence.  Suboxone, ondansetron and Vivitrol are also used for opiate dependence.  Ondansetron is also effective for treating cocaine and meth dependence.

Combination Treatments

A combination of medication and therapy is often the most effective treatment approach for many disorders including depression, addiction, or both (Sammons & Schmidt, 2001).

Case Management and Ancillary Services

Clients with more severe and debilitating disorders often need case
management, psychiatric rehabilitation, vocational rehabilita-tion, and/or social services to address other significant problems.

Suicide

Depression alone and in combination with addiction is one of the highest risk factors for suicide (Cornelius et al, 2001; Shea, 1999; Daley, in press). Clients can benefit from learning to identify and manage warnings signs of suicide such as: 1) increased thoughts about suicide or that life isn’t worth living; 2) talking more about suicide; 3) preparing for death by making out a will; 4) giving away important possessions; 5) worsening of mood (i.e., feeling much more depressed or hopeless; 6) decrease in interest in life school, work, hobbies, friends, other activities); 7)  changes in appetite, sleep or energy (often symptoms of a depressive episode); 8) increased use of alcohol or other drugs; and 9) significant changes in personal appearance or
habits.

Family Issues

The experiences and needs of the family should be considered, too (Daley & Miller, 2001; Daley & Sinberg, 1996; Mondimore, 1999; Papolos & Papolos, 1997; Rosen & Amador, 1996). Involvement in professional treatment and/or self-help programs can be very beneficial for families. Families need information, support and practical help in dealing with a loved one’s disorders. The impact of depression and addiction should always be considered on the client’
s children as well.

Relapse and Recurrence

A client with major depression has a 50% risk of a second episode; if a
second episode is experienced the risk of another episode is 70%; and if a third episode is experienced, the risk of recurrence is 90%. Hence, major depression is recurrent for at least half of those who experience it (Thase, 1999). Similiarly, addiction is a chronic condition for many and relapses are common. Since relapse of one disorder impacts on relapse to the other, clients benefit from learning to identify and manage relapse warning signs as well as high-risk situations unique to them (Daley & Roth, 2000). Reducing relapse risk should be a major emphasis of professional treatment as well as recovery.

Addiction and depression are common co-occurring disorders associated with numerous adverse effects on the client and family. When possible, treatment should be integrated and address both the mood and addictive disorders. Clients should be encouraged to get involved in an ongoing recovery process, particularly since these disorders are chronic and long-term for many. Often, a combination of therapy and medications is needed.

 

 

Posted in Recovery, Treatment | Leave a comment

Finding Effective Treatment

Finding effective treatment for alcoholism is a daunting task faced by alcohol dependent individuals and their loved ones. Adding to the confusion is the fact that treatment for alcohol dependence is currently a very controversial subject. For example, the debate continues as to whether or not alcoholism is a “disease”, and what is the most appropriate treatment. Individuals seeking treatment are confronted with the reality that outside of the traditional 12 Step or Minnesota Model programs, there are few alternatives currently available. Human beings are a diverse group of creatures, with unique needs, especially in terms of treatment for alcohol dependence and substance abuse.

In general there are three basic camps or treatment approaches. The approach embraced by the vast majority of treatment providers is the Minnesota Model. This is your basic12-Step type of program and was developed at the Hazeldon Institute in Minnesota. This model accepts alcoholism as a disease, but defines the disease as being spiritual in nature. It relies heavily on establishing (or re-establishing) spiritual values and reaching an accommodation with a “higher power”. The primary treatment tool is the group meeting. It must be noted that Alcoholics Anonymous does not consider itself a “treatment program”, but rather a group of individuals bound together by a common issue, alcohol dependence.  The vast majority of treatment programs incorporate the 12-Steps as an integral part of their treatment.

The second approach to treatment regards alcoholism as a “learned behavior” rather than as a disease. As such, the focus of treatment utilizes what is known as cognitive restructuring, or cognitive behavioral therapy. Simply stated this means assisting the alcohol dependent individual to assess the various components of their life, and to work on those behaviors which lead to alcohol consumption. This is the approach often utilized by independent treatment professionals and is usually provided in a more intimate one on one setting. Dr. Albert Ellis, PhD, is widely considered the founding father of cognitive behavioral therapy. Finally, there are those who point to the increasing body of evidence that indicates that alcoholism is indeed a disease, albeit a very complicated disease with distinct biological, psychological and social components. This group believes that treatment should be more broad-based and include such new developments as pharmacotherapy. (For example, the use of the medication Naltrexone as an important component of the treatment processes.) It does not require a spiritual epiphany or the acceptance of a Higher Power for recovery. In addition, it relies heavily upon counseling that utilizes cognitive behavioral therapy to address the psychological and social issues of recovery. This position is becoming known as the Pennsylvania Model of Recovery. The Pennsylvania Model of recovery includes protocols that are largely based on the research and work of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Treatment Research Center, in Philadelphia, and in particular Dr. Joseph R.Volpicelli, M.D., Ph.D., also of the University of Pennsylvania. This model fully embraces the use of safe, effective, fully approved medications. These protocols fully integrate pharmacological and psychosocial support in the recovery process. This type of integrated program is distinguished from other protocols, which generally reject the use of pharmacological agents as an aid in the recovery process. The Pennsylvania Model is a medical model, in which a full range of empirically tested treatment options are offered to individuals who are dependent upon alcohol. The University of Pennsylvania has a 20-year history of clinical studies, which has led to the development of these protocols. The medical and scientific community has recognized the research of the University of Pennsylvania for developing important advances in the treatment of alcohol and drug dependence. For example, the University pioneered the use of the pharmacological agent Naltrexone HCI, which suppresses the craving to consume alcohol or opiates, and dramatically reduces relapse. (Archives of General Psychiatry, 49:876-880, 1992 Volpicelli etc.) The vast majority of treatment providers in the United States incorporate the protocols of the Minnesota Model, which again has as its cornerstone the acceptance of a higher power before recovery can be achieved. This is the model that has been used to train treatment professionals for decades. As a result, the Minnesota Model has been accepted almost without question as the only effective treatment option. It is a very rigid method that does not allow individuals to stray far from established procedures. For example, individuals must work each of the twelve steps in order, and secure a “sponsor” or advisor. The utilization of any treatment technique, other than what is proscribed in the Big Book of AA is frowned upon. While the use of medications is not specifically discouraged, neither is it encouraged. For many years, even the use of Physician prescribed anti-depressants was actively discouraged by most well meaning AA groups. The bias against the use of any medication that alters mood or the need to consume alcohol is clearly part of the AA mantra. This is largely due to the fact that many medications (especially psychotropic medications) are not understood by the general public, and in turn, by members of the AA community. As a result, this continuing bias against the use of appropriate medications has resulted in disastrous consequences for countless individuals. While this bias against medications to assist in the recovery process has dramatically reduced their utilization, the primary culprit is the lack of understanding among treatment professionals and physicians, as to their proper use. The majority have very little experience with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of alcohol dependence. While many are generally receptive to the concept of pharmacotherapy, most have never heard of Naltrexone, 13 years after its approval by the United States Food & Drug Administration. In addition to Naltrexone, several new medication’s have been added to the arsenal of treatment options, including Campral® and Ondansetron (Zofran®). The FDA first approved naltrexone in 1984 under the brand name Trexan for the treatment of opiate abuse. In 1994, the FDA extended its use to include alcohol dependence and was marketed by DuPont Pharma under the brand name ReVia. Since December 1997, it has been available as a generic. While there was some initial enthusiasm for Naltrexone, most treatment providers became easily discouraged, because it did not produce immediate and positive results for all their patients. At best they reported “spotty” results. The Naltrexone seemed to work well with one individual, while being seemingly ineffective with others. We now believe that many individuals received inadequate dosage and inappropriate time of dosage, for their unique metabolism and life patterns, and in turn reported the medication ineffective. There are numerous additional factors affecting the effectiveness of Naltrexone, for example age and gender. In addition, the presence of pre-existing conditions such as clinical depression probably must be addressed with appropriate anti-depression medication. Other factors that must be addressed include social, relationship, legal, and employment issues, which can all directly impact the recovery process. Mental health professionals have long understood the need to adjust the dosage of medications prescribed for their patients. Each individual is unique, and reacts to medications uniquely. Alcohol treatment professionals who utilized Naltrexone rarely ventured outside of the Physicians Desk Reference’s (PDR) recommended guidelines. For example the PDR recommends that Naltrexone be taken in the morning. The thought behind this recommendation was that it would improve medication compliance by getting an individual in the habit of taking the Naltrexone first thing each morning. The reality is that very few people drink first thing in the morning. They need the full effect of the medication much later in the afternoon as the thought process turns to going home and “relaxing” with “a” drink. It is increasingly clear that issues such as dosage and length of treatment can vary greatly from individual to individual, and what may be appropriate for a man, is not necessarily so for a woman. An article published in THE SCIENTIST 16(6): 29: March 18, 2002 entitled THE INEQUALITY OF DRUG METABOLISM describes how the same medication and dosage often have different outcomes for men and women. Our experience has shown that a 50 mg dose of Naltrexone, when combined with therapy is usually effective for older males (50 and over), and usually ineffective, even with therapy for females of any age. We have found that the most effective dose for most females is a minimum of 100 mg per day or even higher. It is interesting to note that much of the initial research on Naltrexone was conducted at Veterans Administration facilities, whose subjects were mostly older males. What most treatment professionals do not seem to comprehend is that medications are an extremely effective tool, when appropriately utilized, and that they are not cures in themselves. The task of the medications is to suppress the intense craving or irrational thoughts to consume alcohol, which are generated by alcohol compromised brain chemistry. Alcohol dependent individuals often describe an “inner” battle that takes place relentlessly. The rational and sane voice which counsels that alcohol is destroying their life and that changes need to be made. And then there is the voice generated from the primitive brain or the pleasure center that whispers, you need that glass of wine, that you need that shot of vodka to get past the moment of stress or discomfort. The medications “level the playing field” by quieting the thoughts generated by the primitive brain allowing the rational and sane thought process to prevail. The fact of the matter is that safe, effective medications will dramatically impact alcohol consumption. In effect, the medications force an individual to face life, on life’s terms. Alcohol can be compared to a sandbox. An alcohol dependent individual will stick his/her head in the sand, like an ostrich, with an illusion that everything is alright. When the individual removes his/her head from the sandbox (stop drinking), they are confronted with a lion; they are confronted by life. The lion roars and they stick their head back into the sandbox (resume drinking). The medications remove the sandbox, forcing the individual to confront the lion and to deal with life issues. The most difficult aspect of recovery is not stopping the consumption of alcohol but rather learning how to be happy without alcohol. Most alcohol dependent individuals are not well equipped to make the successful transition to sobriety. Even though the irrational thought process or craving to consume alcohol has been suppressed by the medications, the years of irrational behavior can overwhelm them. They have become dependent upon the alcohol to deal with all their problems, to in effect to deal with the “lion” in their life. Unless they can start to successfully address these problems, they will almost certainly begin drinking again. When this occurs, it is simple to blame the medications for “not working”. The medications do not replace treatment or counseling. Their primary purpose is to create a mental environment in which an alcohol dependent individual is able to focus on the recovery process, utilizing for example Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Historically, when an individual slips or has a relapse, the blame is placed squarely on the shoulder of that individual. It is time that treatment providers must now also begin to accept some of the “blame”. Treatment plans should include the latest scientific advances and should be tailored to the individual’s unique requirements. Reliance on outdated and ineffective treatment methods has created an environment that fully expects individuals to fail, and fail again until such time that rock bottom has been reached. It is often said that once an individual has reached rock bottom that there is only one way to go, UP. The problem with that philosophy is that for many people, the ultimate rock bottom is death. Many, (if not indeed most) alcohol dependent individuals have lost faith in themselves, and more importantly hope for the future. It is common for such individuals to have numerous attempts at sobriety, most often using 12-Step methods. They have been programmed to accept themselves as hopeless and powerless, with their chance for recovery being slim to none. It is important to recognize that alcohol dependent individuals do have control over their lives and that there is appropriate help for them to be found in the treatment community. It is up to the individual to determine what is the most appropriate treatment. It is up to the treatment community to provide options that set up individuals to succeed

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

What Everyone Should Know About How to Save Lives From Opiate Overdose

A powerful antidote that can reverse the potentially deadly effects of opiate drug overdoses – including those from prescription painkillers — has saved more than 10,000 lives in 15 years, but it’s still little-known and too hard to get, a new report shows.

Naloxone, a drug sold as Narcan, is so effective that it can revive virtually all victims of the ODs within minutes using a simple shot or, more easily, a nasal spray. It was first distributed through needle exchange programs in the mid-1990s to prevent deaths of injection heroin users.

Increasingly, though, naloxone is showing up in the medicine cabinets, kitchen cupboards and even the handbags of middle-class moms as some mainstream families find themselves grappling with escalating opiate addiction in their teens and young adults.

“I kept it right on the counter by the microwave,” said Linda Wohlen, a 65-year-old school secretary who lives near Brockton, Mass. She used a naloxone kit to revive her son Steven, now 28, from a heroin overdose nearly two years ago.

“I have it in my bedroom and I always have one in my pocketbook. It’s a terrible position for a parent to be in, but you are expecting them to use,” she said.

Wohlen and her husband, John, obtained the naloxone through Learn to Cope, a Massachusetts-based group for parents of teens and young adults addicted to opiates.

It’s one of 188 local sites run by 48 programs in 15 states and the District of Columbia. Since 1996, they’ve trained more than 53,000 people to save an addict’s life, said Eliza Wheeler, author of areport published last month by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“We don’t believe that death should be a consequence of using drugs. Death doesn’t teach a lesson,” said Wheeler, manager of an overdose prevention project for the Harm Reduction Coalition in Oakland, Calif.

Having naloxone on hand can be an act of last resort, a final safety net for parents who’ve tried everything from threats and demands to jail and drug treatment, only to have their addicted children overdose.

“To me, it’s about parents wanting their children to survive,” Wheeler added.

About one in five U.S. high school students has misused prescription drugs, including painkillers, a 2009 government health study found, and some states, like Missouri, are reporting a renewed rise in heroin deaths among young people.

But most parents – like most people – have never heard of naloxone and have no idea where or how to get it, experts say.

“The light goes off when you’re talking to the parent of a kid who’s dealing with opiate addiction,” said Mark Kinzly, a trainer with the New York-based Harm Reduction Coalition and a former addict. “When they hear that there’s something out there that they could have access to, they’re all for it. It’s just like the parent of a child who’s allergic to bee stings.”

Unlike an EpiPen for allergies, however, naloxone suffers from both the stigma of its association with illicit drug use and from the lack of sustained funding for outreach to drug users, experts said.

“There’s an intangible truth that people care less about drug-addicted folks than other folks,” said Maya Doe-Simkins, a Chicago public health consultant and researcher who has focused on naloxone.

Michele McDonald / for msnbc.com

Naloxone, an opiate antidote, comes in injection and nasal forms.

Slowly, though, distribution of naloxone is growing, along with the nation’s prescription painkiller epidemic, which has seen overdose deaths triple since 1990, according to the CDC. The number of programs distributing naloxone has climbed steadily from about 15 nationwide in 2005 to 48 in 2010, Wheeler’s data showed.

Overall, some 37,004 people died after drug overdoses in 2009, the most recent year for which figures are available, according to the CDC. About three-quarters of the deaths were attributed to prescription painkillers.

Although there are no firm figures, those drugs are starting to show up along with injection heroin in reported naloxone rescues in the San Francisco area, Wheeler said.

“Since around 2010, we have seen an increase in people reporting to us that they’ve used their naloxone to revive people who had taken opioid pills, either in combination with other drugs or alone,” said Wheeler, noting that the pills have included fentanyl, morphine and hydromorphone, among other opiates.

‘It all begins with the pills.’
Whether the overdose is caused by pills or heroin hardly matters to Wheeler – or to the many parents who say their kids may have started out using one kind of opiate but quickly escalated to another.

“It all begins with the pills,” said Joanne Peterson of Randolph, Mass., who founded Learn to Cope in 2004, after her then-teenage son started using prescription drugs, then heroin.

“I never, ever would have imagined my son doing heroin, ever. We lived in a nice neighborhood, we have a nice home, we water ski, we camp. We are not what anyone would picture,” Peterson added. Now 28, her son is in long-term recovery, is married and has kids of his own.

In Linda Wohlen’s case, her son Steven started using prescription pills at about age 19, when he still was a “wonderful kid with a heart of gold” who liked to crack jokes and ride bikes on the half-pipe in his family’s backyard, she said.

By 26, he’d become a heroin addict whose mother watched him walk out the front door one day, and, minutes later, found him blue and unresponsive on the front lawn.

“I knew right away what it was,” said Wohlen, who quickly rushed out with her naloxone kit. “It just takes seconds, half up one nostril, half up the other.”

The kit, which sells for about $10, contained a vial of naloxone nasal spray and an adapter that allows it to be easily administered. Other kits contain injectable versions approved by the Food and Drug Administration that require more skill to deliver.

Naloxone blocks the brain receptors that respond to opiates, instantly reversing the high and sending the addict into an abrupt and often painful withdrawal. It has no effect on intoxication from alcohol or other drugs.

Naloxone typically is available only through drug programs that offer training as well as distribution. Such programs are limited and they’re almost non-existent in some states with high rates of opiate overdoses. The South Boston Hope & Recovery Coalition has a national search site that can locate programs in specific ZIP codes. To search, click here.

Prescribing laws are complicated and vary from state to state, said Scott Burris, a law professor at Temple University and director of the Center for Health Law, Policy and Practice.

“If you go to a pediatrician, the doc could prescribe the drug for the child and the parents could pick it up and have it on hand,” he said. “The place where it’s difficult is: You go to the adult doctor and say ‘My kid is using.’”

Some states, such as Washington, have passed so-called “Good Samaritan” laws that absolve users of naloxone from legal penalties that might arise from employing the drug to save someone’s life.

Activists like Doe-Simkins would like to see wider availability of naloxone through doctors’ offices, jails, drug treatment and detox programs, as well as through more parent outreach programs.

“Those models are the next wave,” she said.

But not everyone agrees that take-home naloxone is a good idea.

Critics long have argued that the availability of the drug gives addicts an excuse to use because they don’t have to fear an overdose death. Some charge that parents who keep naloxone on hand are enabling their children’s addiction.

Bertha K. Madras, a former official with the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, has supported naloxone use by trained health professionals, but has expressed concerns about use by addicts and their families or friends, if naloxone rescue is not supervised by health care workers.

A professor at Harvard Medical School, Madras cites studies that have shaped her worries that rescued addicts might not be appropriately monitored for medical complications, and that there won’t be enough emphasis on getting addicts into treatment. The lives of naloxone-rescued people remain in danger of future overdoses and possibly death, she said.

“My foremost principle is to save lives,” she wrote in an email to msnbc.com. “My secondary principle is to save more than a life during a crisis, but to prevent a recurrence, or save a person from a lifetime of addiction and its adverse outcomes, from depression, or from noncompliance with pain medications.”

But Wheeler said such critics may be confusing rescue with recovery. “Naloxone is not drug treatment,” she said. “It’s an immediately life-saving act.”

The worst conversations, she said, are those with the parents of addicts who died without the antidote, a reality Linda Wohlen can imagine all too well.

Steven is in prison now, serving time for drug-fueled theft. But at least he’s clean, sober – and alive, she said.

“If people think it’s enabling, too bad, they haven’t walked a mile in my shoes,” Wohlen said. “I was only focused on saving my son. I can’t help him kick this problem if he’s dead.”

Posted in Editorial, Recovery | Leave a comment

Personal Fitness Promotes Recovery

Assisted Recovery Centers of America is pleased to announce that it will now provide a physical fitness consultation as part of an overall plan for recovery from alcohol and or drugs.  We are especially fortunate to have on our staff Mr. Jesse Ochoa who is a Certified Personal Trainer.

Physical fitness is directly related to improved mental health and positively impacts the ability to recover from alcohol and substance abuse.  Exercise is the natural way of releasing endorphins, which helps to fight depression while promoting a sense of well being.  Abusing alcohol and drugs compromises the normal production and release of endorphins, which in turn causes stress, anxiety, lack of self-esteem, irritability and so on.

Increasing psychological health is achieved by reducing anxiety, reducing stress, and boosting confidence, which can all be attained through exercise.  Exercise creates the feeling of well-being due to the body’s release of endorphins.  During either low or high impact physical activity, endorphins are released by the brain, which increases the feeling of happiness.  Eventually, exercise, along with proper diet, begins to help us “look better” as well.  In turn, feeling better about the way we look boosts confidence levels and helps avoid depression.  Exercise is also beneficial in gaining energy and assists as an aid for sleep.  Proper rest will help with stress reduction and assist in lowering the high levels of anxiety.

Posted in Editorial, Recovery | Leave a comment

Smoking Cessation Drug May Help Reduce Drinking

The smoking cessation drug Chantix (varenicline) may help curb problem drinking, a small study suggests. The drug may block the pleasurable effects of alcohol by increasing blood pressure, heart rate and feelings of nausea and sadness, the researchers said. Some people who take Chantix to quit smoking have reported they reduced the amount of alcohol they consumed.

In the study, 15 healthy participants who were heavy-to-moderate social drinkers took part in six sessions. In three sessions, they received a two-milligram dose of the drug, while in the other three sessions, they received a placebo drug. In all six sessions, after a three-hour wait they drank a beverage containing either a placebo, a low dose of alcohol, or a high dose of alcohol.

Before and after each session, the researchers asked them about their mood, tested their eye movements and measured blood pressure, heart rate and other physical responses. The participants said the Chantix-alcohol combination increased the unpleasant side effects of alcohol, and reduced its rewarding aspects.

“We think that varenicline may reduce drinking by altering the effects of alcohol. Our findings shed light on the mechanism underlying why people consume less alcohol when they have taken varenicline,” study author Emma Childs of the University of Chicago said in a news release.

The results of the study are scheduled to be published in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research.

Chantix has been controversial because of its potential side effects. In July 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required that the drug carry a “black box” warning about the potential risks of depression and suicidal thoughts, HealthDay reports. In June 2011, the FDA said the drug may be associated with a small, increased riskof certain heart problems in patients with heart disease.

Posted in Treatment | 2 Comments

Assisted Recovery Centers of America Mission Statement

Alcohol and / or drug (AOD) abuse, and AOD abuse related issues are among society’s most pervasive medical and social problems.  Assisted Recovery Centers of Arizonarecognizes that appropriate treatment can be effective for motivated individuals seeking recovery.  This Agency’s treatment protocols are based on the research and work of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, TreatmentResearchCenter, in Philadelphia.  The protocols fully integrate pharmacological options and psychosocial support in the recovery process.  This type of integrated program is an example of the Pennsylvania Model of Recovery, which distinguishes this approach from other protocols, which reject the use of pharmacological agents as an adjutant to aid in the recovery process.

 

The Pennsylvania Model is based on a medical model in which a full range of empirically tested treatment options is offered to individuals who are dependent upon AOD.  TheUniversityofPennsylvaniahas a 20-year history of clinical studies, which has led to the development of the Pennsylvania Model protocols.  The medical and scientific community recognizes the research of theUniversityofPennsylvaniaas representing important advances in the treatment of addictions.  For example, the University pioneered the use of the pharmacological agent Naltrexone HCI, which suppresses the craving to consume alcohol or opiates, and dramatically reduces relapse. (Archives of General Psychiatry, 49:876-880, 1992 Volpicelli etc.)

 

Assisted Recovery recognizes the value of clinical research, and was among the first in the nation to implement a program based on research.  Our program uniquely combines not only quality compassion and concern, but also the best of empirically discovered strategies to assist AOD dependent individuals to become sober and happy, and most importantly, remain so.

 

Assisted Recovery and the Pennsylvania Model embrace the concept that AOD dependence is a Bio-Psycho-Social condition, which is clearly influenced by genetic factors.  We accept that there are many paths to recovery.  For example, countless individuals have recovered from AOD via the traditional Minnesota Model or Twelve-Step format. Appropriate individuals, who would benefit from such a program, would find this Agency fully supportive of their efforts.  For those individuals who are not comfortable, or have repeatedly failed to achieve sobriety via the Minnesota Model, Assisted Recovery offers the Pennsylvania Model of Recovery.

 

 

 

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

Ondansetron & Alcohol Dependence

A drug currently used to fight nausea in cancer patients has been shown to help the hardest to treat alcoholics reduce their drinking, according to new research.

As researchers continue to find medications that will reduce craving in those who are trying to stop drinking, scientists at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio discovered that the medication ondansetron may be an effective therapy — especially for patients with early-onset alcohol dependence.

Ondansetron appears to work by acting on serotonin, one of the brain’s many neurotransmitters. An imbalance between two chemical messengers in the brain, serotonin and dopamine, is believed to create a craving for alcohol.

In the study, 271 patients with diagnosed alcoholism were randomly selected to receive one of three different doses of either ondansetron or a placebo for 11 weeks.

The ondansetron patients with early-onset alcoholism had fewer drinks per day and reported more days without drinking at all, compared to the other groups in the study. Everyone in the study group also participated in weekly group cognitive behavioral psychotherapy.

Early-Onset Alcoholics

“Dr. Johnson’s findings are consistent with a lengthy literature on serotonin dysfunction among early-onset alcoholics,” said NIAAA Director Enoch Gordis, M.D. “If confirmed in future studies, they may predict new treatments for a subgroup of patients who often are resistant to behavioral therapies alone.”

“Early-onset” alcoholics are those who develop problem drinking before age 25, and are believed to have a biological predisposition toward alcoholism, according to researchers. They represent about 3.5 million of the nation’s alcoholics, said Dr. Bankole Johnson, a psychiatrist who led the study.

Early-onset alcoholics have a “greater family history of alcoholism, increased propensity for antisocial behaviors, and a more stable and severe disease state than those with late-onset alcoholism,” according to the NIAAA.

The early-onset alcoholics historically are not helped by counseling, exhibit anti-social behavior and have a high relapse rate when they attempt to stop drinking.

“The findings could lead to better ways to treat alcoholism and to tailor treatment to specific types of alcoholics,” Dr. Henry Kranzler of the University of Connecticut said in the August issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Ondansetron, manufactured by Glaxo Wellcome Inc., is FDA-approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea at doses much larger than those used in the alcoholism study. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism funded the Texas study.
 

Posted in Treatment | Leave a comment