Smoking Cessation Drug May Help Reduce Drinking

The smoking cessation drug Chantix (varenicline) may help curb problem drinking, a small study suggests. The drug may block the pleasurable effects of alcohol by increasing blood pressure, heart rate and feelings of nausea and sadness, the researchers said. Some people who take Chantix to quit smoking have reported they reduced the amount of alcohol they consumed.

In the study, 15 healthy participants who were heavy-to-moderate social drinkers took part in six sessions. In three sessions, they received a two-milligram dose of the drug, while in the other three sessions, they received a placebo drug. In all six sessions, after a three-hour wait they drank a beverage containing either a placebo, a low dose of alcohol, or a high dose of alcohol.

Before and after each session, the researchers asked them about their mood, tested their eye movements and measured blood pressure, heart rate and other physical responses. The participants said the Chantix-alcohol combination increased the unpleasant side effects of alcohol, and reduced its rewarding aspects.

“We think that varenicline may reduce drinking by altering the effects of alcohol. Our findings shed light on the mechanism underlying why people consume less alcohol when they have taken varenicline,” study author Emma Childs of the University of Chicago said in a news release.

The results of the study are scheduled to be published in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research.

Chantix has been controversial because of its potential side effects. In July 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required that the drug carry a “black box” warning about the potential risks of depression and suicidal thoughts, HealthDay reports. In June 2011, the FDA said the drug may be associated with a small, increased riskof certain heart problems in patients with heart disease.

Posted in Treatment | Leave a comment

Assisted Recovery Centers of America Mission Statement

Alcohol and / or drug (AOD) abuse, and AOD abuse related issues are among society’s most pervasive medical and social problems.  Assisted Recovery Centers of Arizonarecognizes that appropriate treatment can be effective for motivated individuals seeking recovery.  This Agency’s treatment protocols are based on the research and work of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, TreatmentResearchCenter, in Philadelphia.  The protocols fully integrate pharmacological options and psychosocial support in the recovery process.  This type of integrated program is an example of the Pennsylvania Model of Recovery, which distinguishes this approach from other protocols, which reject the use of pharmacological agents as an adjutant to aid in the recovery process.

 

The Pennsylvania Model is based on a medical model in which a full range of empirically tested treatment options is offered to individuals who are dependent upon AOD.  TheUniversityofPennsylvaniahas a 20-year history of clinical studies, which has led to the development of the Pennsylvania Model protocols.  The medical and scientific community recognizes the research of theUniversityofPennsylvaniaas representing important advances in the treatment of addictions.  For example, the University pioneered the use of the pharmacological agent Naltrexone HCI, which suppresses the craving to consume alcohol or opiates, and dramatically reduces relapse. (Archives of General Psychiatry, 49:876-880, 1992 Volpicelli etc.)

 

Assisted Recovery recognizes the value of clinical research, and was among the first in the nation to implement a program based on research.  Our program uniquely combines not only quality compassion and concern, but also the best of empirically discovered strategies to assist AOD dependent individuals to become sober and happy, and most importantly, remain so.

 

Assisted Recovery and the Pennsylvania Model embrace the concept that AOD dependence is a Bio-Psycho-Social condition, which is clearly influenced by genetic factors.  We accept that there are many paths to recovery.  For example, countless individuals have recovered from AOD via the traditional Minnesota Model or Twelve-Step format. Appropriate individuals, who would benefit from such a program, would find this Agency fully supportive of their efforts.  For those individuals who are not comfortable, or have repeatedly failed to achieve sobriety via the Minnesota Model, Assisted Recovery offers the Pennsylvania Model of Recovery.

 

 

 

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

Ondansetron & Alcohol Dependence

A drug currently used to fight nausea in cancer patients has been shown to help the hardest to treat alcoholics reduce their drinking, according to new research.

As researchers continue to find medications that will reduce craving in those who are trying to stop drinking, scientists at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio discovered that the medication ondansetron may be an effective therapy — especially for patients with early-onset alcohol dependence.

Ondansetron appears to work by acting on serotonin, one of the brain’s many neurotransmitters. An imbalance between two chemical messengers in the brain, serotonin and dopamine, is believed to create a craving for alcohol.

In the study, 271 patients with diagnosed alcoholism were randomly selected to receive one of three different doses of either ondansetron or a placebo for 11 weeks.

The ondansetron patients with early-onset alcoholism had fewer drinks per day and reported more days without drinking at all, compared to the other groups in the study. Everyone in the study group also participated in weekly group cognitive behavioral psychotherapy.

Early-Onset Alcoholics

“Dr. Johnson’s findings are consistent with a lengthy literature on serotonin dysfunction among early-onset alcoholics,” said NIAAA Director Enoch Gordis, M.D. “If confirmed in future studies, they may predict new treatments for a subgroup of patients who often are resistant to behavioral therapies alone.”

“Early-onset” alcoholics are those who develop problem drinking before age 25, and are believed to have a biological predisposition toward alcoholism, according to researchers. They represent about 3.5 million of the nation’s alcoholics, said Dr. Bankole Johnson, a psychiatrist who led the study.

Early-onset alcoholics have a “greater family history of alcoholism, increased propensity for antisocial behaviors, and a more stable and severe disease state than those with late-onset alcoholism,” according to the NIAAA.

The early-onset alcoholics historically are not helped by counseling, exhibit anti-social behavior and have a high relapse rate when they attempt to stop drinking.

“The findings could lead to better ways to treat alcoholism and to tailor treatment to specific types of alcoholics,” Dr. Henry Kranzler of the University of Connecticut said in the August issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Ondansetron, manufactured by Glaxo Wellcome Inc., is FDA-approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea at doses much larger than those used in the alcoholism study. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism funded the Texas study.
 

Posted in Treatment | Leave a comment

The ABC’s of Cognitive Therapy

REBT is a form of cognitive therapy that is simple enough and effective enough to be used by anybody and it works. We don’t need to take on a set of new beliefs but instead examine the ones we already have as some of them may be causing us problems.

For example the issue of someone else’s behavior making us angry. This is a very common way of expressing something and we hear it all the time, but in fact it distorts the situation it attempts to describe. A more accurate description of “someone making me angry” is to say that I feel angry about their behavior. They are not making me anything- they are simply behaving in a way that I get angry about. Whenever they behave like that, I become angry. The responsibility for the anger is mine, not theirs.

This can sound strange at first, but dealing with anger this way works. REBT says that it is often irrational and self-defeating to get all worked up about someone else’s behavior. The anger is based on a faulty assumption, which is that the other person should not behave in a way I don’t like. If you think about it, what the other person SHOULD do is not what they DO do. This is a very important element of the equation- reality. They do what they do, and then I/you get angry about it. Since they are going to do that anyway, it seems, then it would make life a great deal easier if I/you didn’t get angry about it! This is what REBT can accomplish. The missing part of the puzzle, and the part that is the really crucial part, is what we think about what they do.

For example, if I really believe that they MUST NOT do whatever they are doing, and then they still continue to do it, then the demand that I have inside my head that says; “they MUST NOT do that” will put considerable pressure on me from the inside to do something about it, which I am generally unable to do. It will make me feel bad; frustrated, ineffective, angry, desperate, hurt, enraged, and so on because I cannot translate the demand “they MUST NOT do that” into reality. Most external phenomena, including the behavior of other people, I simply cannot control.

How much easier it is if I can become aware of this and make a choice to change the demand “they MUST NOT do that” into a more rational alternative, which actually means something; “I PREFER that they don’t do that”. Once I downgrade the demand to a simple preference, the heat is turned down and I can function again. After all, its now only a preference! REBT has a simple exercise to help us called ABCs. It is used to analyze the situation and change our thinking about it so that without trying to change external reality, we can feel better about it. [This doesn't mean that we should never try to change external reality- sometimes it is appropriate- it's when it isn't an appropriate or effective response that we can choose to have a different  response instead in order to feel better].

I’ll give you an example. To use this for yourself, just pick any situation where someone’s behavior is “making you angry” (!) and take a look and see what it is you are thinking about it that is irrational, and change it into something more rational. It is irrational to demand that people behave in the way we want them to! OK, here is an example using the kids who play outside where I live.

A. (Activating situation) Kids are playing outside, making some noise.

B. (irrational Belief I have about A) They shouldn’t make any noise, they must not disturb me at all.

C. (Consequences of having those beliefs about A) When kids play outside I Feel angry, I replay the tape in my head about how badly brought up they are, about what delinquents they will grow up to be, I start fantasizing about how I can get at them, how I can get the local authority to fence the area off, I stand glowering and watching the playing children through the blinds. I assume malicious motives when none are present. It feels bad!

D. (Dispute the irrational Beliefs in B by turning them into questions and answers)

# WHY shouldn’t they make any noise? That is silly, they are children ant its what they do when they play- they make a certain amount of noise. # WHY must they not disturb me at all? Can’t they disturb me just a little bit? Is it really them, or is this me being irrational and demanding that children shouldn’t be playing anywhere where I can hear them?

E. (Effective new thinking- substitute something rational instead of B)

Children can play, it’s no big deal. It is inevitable that they make some noise. I will CHOOSE to not upset myself about this, and I will stop even noticing it because it is not a problem for me.

F. (Feelings since I changed my thinking) Whew! That is much, much better. The problem was all in my head. It’s amazing, but true.

Here’s another example- an ABC can be really short, like this:

A. (Activating situation) I try to do something

B. (irrational Belief I have about A) I must be successful at this

C. (Consequences of believing B) If unsuccessful- woops! I feel bad, depressed, like I let myself down, etc

D. (Dispute the Irrational Belief in B) Why must I be successful?

E. (Effective new thinking to replace B) I would prefer to be successful but if I’m not then I don’t need to make myself feel bad.

F. (Feelings after changing the beliefs about A) That feels better

Okay, that’s it. That is your crash course in REBT. Try this ABC technique with something that is bothering you. Try to keep it as simple as you can while you get used to the ideas involved. Be aware of “should-ing” and “musterbation” in your thinking. Here are some things you might believe, so these would be your “B”s;

I must not feel overwhelmed with responsibilities

People must not take me for granted

I need a cigarette,

I should be able to smoke

I need a drink, etc

 

Posted in Recovery, Treatment | Leave a comment

Pot Predicament: Safer than Alcohol? Can Marijuana Use Actually Save Lives on the Road?

Proponents of legalizing marijuana have long argued that criminalization of the drug causes more problems than it solves. For instance, taxpayers spend between $7.5 billion and $10 billion a year on arresting and prosecuting Americans for marijuana-related crimes. Supporters of legalized marijuana maintain that this money would be better spent cracking down on violent criminals.

Now, pro-legalization backers have yet another point in their favor: According to a new study from the University of Colorado-Denver, the 16 states that have legalized medical marijuana have seen an average 9 percent drop in traffic deaths since their medical marijuana laws took effect. The study analyzed data from 1990 through 2009.

“We went into our research expecting the opposite effect,” says study co-author Daniel Rees, a professor of economics at the University of Colorado-Denver. “We thought medical marijuana legalization would increase traffic fatalities. We were stunned by the results.”

When it comes to traffic safety, can marijuana really save lives?

Is marijuana an alcohol substitute?

Is this a sign of the times? A new study ties legalization of medical marijuana to a decrease in fatal car crashes in 16 states. One possible reason: Motorists who are high tend to drive slowly.

It’s long been known that alcohol is a primary contributor to deadly car crashes. According to estimates from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, drivers with a blood-alcohol level above 0.15 percent are 385 times as likely to be involved in a fatal crash as sober drivers are. In every state, the legal limit for driving while intoxicated is 0.08 percent.

The University of Colorado-Denver study found that the increase in legal use of medical marijuana often leads to a reduction in alcohol consumption. The study cites data from the Beer Institute, an industry trade group, indicating that beer purchases go down by an average of 5 percent after medical marijuana laws are passed. In these states, the researchers theorize, some people are smoking marijuana rather than downing booze.

A 2009 study from the University of California, Berkeley, backs up that finding. Four of every 10 patients at the university’s medical marijuana dispensary said they used marijuana to curb alcohol cravings.

Are high drivers better than drunken drivers?

The differences between drivers under the influence of alcohol and those who’ve smoked weed are stark, says Mason Tvert, executive director of the marijuana legalization advocacy group SAFER (Safer Alternative for Enjoyable Recreation).

“People who abuse alcohol take more risks, drive faster and are less likely to recognize that they’re impaired,” Tvert says. “They feel like Superman when they’re drunk.”

By contrast, motorists who’ve puffed pot “drive slower, are less likely to take risks, and are more likely to recognize when they’re impaired and decide not to drive,” he says.

Studies support Tvert’s view: A clinical trial conducted in Israel compared the simulated driving skills of people who’d consumed alcohol and those who’d smoked marijuana. The researchers found that alcohol caused these people to speed up their driving, while smoking marijuana prompted the drivers to slow down. An analysis by the U.S. Department of Transportation found marijuana rarely is the only drug found in the bodies of drivers who’ve died in car crashes.

Is driving under the influence of marijuana safe?

Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) advocates against impaired driving of any form, and that includes smoking marijuana and getting behind the wheel. Emily Tompkins, MADD’s executive director for Colorado, says the group is keeping tabs on marijuana legalization and how it affects traffic safety.

MADD isn’t interested in determining how much marijuana someone can consume to remain within a legal limit, but Tompkins urges people who smoke marijuana (medical or otherwise) to be aware of when their driving is impaired. Tompkins claims marijuana-impaired drivers often show their medical marijuana cards to police officers who pull them over, as though the card legally entitles them to drive under the influence of drugs — which it does not.

The U.S. Department of Transportation found that although the harm of marijuana for drivers is minimal compared with that of alcohol and other drugs, it may be dangerous in certain situations, such as when quick thinking is required or when a driver has combined marijuana with alcohol or other drugs.

No one is advocating that driving while stoned is better than being alcohol- or drug-free, but experts agree that marijuana use while driving presents far less danger than many other drugs as well as alcohol.

Meanwhile, more Americans appear to be embracing marijuana. A Gallup poll released in October 2011 found that a record-high 50 percent of Americans favor legalizing marijuana. In 2009, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health showed 16.7 million Americans age 12 and older had smoked pot at least once in the month before being surveyed.

Could widespread legalization boost road safety?

Dan Rees, an economics professor at the University of Colorado-Denver, says he was “stunned” by the findings of the medical marijuana study.

While the University of Colorado-Denver study presents striking evidence of marijuana’s effect on road safety, the research was limited to motorists who have access to medical marijuana. In some states, that’s a relatively significant portion of the population. In Montana, 3 percent of the state’s population has access to medical marijuana; in Colorado, it’s 2.5 percent. Actual percentages for marijuana use may be considerably higher than that, however.

“Under medical marijuana laws, caregivers and patients can grow marijuana, and there’s very little policing of this,” Rees says.

Rees believes that authorized marijuana users often sell or give pot to others for recreational use. He says many of those recreational users probably are young adults — a group who’s responsible for a disproportionately high number of alcohol-related car crashes. Marijuana advocacy group NORML says pot is the third most popular recreational “drug” in the United States, behind alcohol and tobacco.

Rees teamed up with D. Mark Anderson, assistant professor of economics at Montana State University, on the marijuana study.

For now, medical marijuana is legal in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington, as well as the District of Columbia. In those places, doctors prescribe marijuana to ease pain and suffering for patients with conditions like cancer.

Federal law prohibits the growth and sale of marijuana for any purpose. Opponents of legalizing the drug maintain that marijuana is a “gateway” to harder drugs like cocaine and heroin, and argue that the dangers posed by stoned drivers would rise.

While widespread legalization of marijuana isn’t likely in the near future, such a move might have a dramatic effect on road safety if drivers — particularly young adults — flock to marijuana instead of alcohol to get buzzed.

“When you see fewer traffic accidents in every state that legalizes medical marijuana, that’s strong proof,” Rees says.

Posted in Editorial | 2 Comments

Opioid Abuse: Raising the Red Flag


According to the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health(NSDUH), about 2.4 million Americans use prescription drugsfor non-medical purposes (in other words, without a prescription or to get high). In November 2011, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported that the death toll from narcotic pain reliever overdose — about 15,000 a year, or 40 deaths a day — is now greater than that of heroin and cocaine combined.

It’s understandable, then, that critics of these new superdrugs cite the potential for addiction and abuse as a reason for caution.

Dr. Gharibo acknowledges that abuse is a concern with opioid narcotics: “The majority of the misuse out there starts out very casually. Patients may double up on their medications and then build up a certain degree of tolerance.” He also notes: “There’s a lot of misprescribing out there that pretty much started in the late ’90s, where we started overprescribing opioids. Now we’re sort of treading back from what we did. There’s a pendulum that goes back and forth.”

Critics have also noted that Zohydro can be easily crushed, a feature popular with addicts who can snort the powder for an immediate high. OxyContin, which was initially also crushable, now comes in a more tamper-resistant form. Gharibo says, “For those products that are lacking the tamper resistance, it’s sort of like lacking the seat belt on a car. It’s just too easy to abuse.” He notes that more tamper-resistant opioid formulations are expected to become available over the next decade.

According to the AP article, patients taking the new superdrugs will be more closely supervised, since under government regulations a refill of pure hydrocodone requires a new prescription. By comparison, Vicodin may be refilled up to five times within six months of the time the initial prescription was written.

Acetaminophen: Safety Concerns

There’s another advantage to the new drugs: The makers of Zohydro also claim that it will actually be safer than Vicodin, since unlike that medication it won’t contain acetaminophen. Acetaminophen is the main ingredient in the nonprescription painkiller Tylenol, and it’s also found in many over-the-counter cold drugs. But too much acetaminophen can be harmful to the liver, and because it’s in so many products, overdose is a real danger.

“Oral acetaminophen toxicity is the leading cause of liver transplantations in the country,” says Dr. Gharibo, adding that often patients are unaware of their total acetaminophen intake.

Bottom line: These new pain medications ”could be a valuable addition,” says Gharibo. “It could be useful to have a broader palette to utilize, so that we don’t have to keep going up and up on the dosing for the drugs that are available now. I wouldn’t keep this particular compound from being approved.”

But, he says, Zohydro and the other super painkillers should only be used for a limited time and only for those patients who can follow their doctors’ directions and who are psychologically stable, ie, not prone to addiction. “They have to be used for the right clinical indication, in the right patient, and in the right setting.”

Posted in Editorial | 1 Comment

Clinical Hypnotherapy Now at Assisted Recovery Centers of America

Assisted Recovery Centers of America is pleased to announce the addition of  Dr. Kathleen Lagerman, PhD, CHT, CIHT, CMHT.  as its Clinical Hypnotherapist.  Dr. Lagerman has 16 years of experience in the field and is a nationally recognized expert clinical hypnotherapist.

Assisted Recovery offers a Bio/Psycho/Social approach to recovery from alcohol and substance dependence.  The addition of clinical  hypnotherapy provides a significant  and effective tool to assist individuals address the biological, psychological and social components of recovery.

What is Clinical Hypnotherapy?

The term “hypnosis” comes from the Greek word hypnos, meaning “sleep.” Hypnotherapists use exercises that bring about deep relaxation and an altered state of consciousness, also known as a trance. A person in a deeply focused state is unusually responsive to an idea or image, but this does not mean that a hypnotist can control the person’s mind and free will. On the contrary, hypnosis can actually teach people how to master their own states of awareness. By doing so they can affect their own bodily functions and psychological responses.

The History of Hypnotherapy

Throughout history, trance states have been used by shamans and ancient peoples in rituals and religious ceremonies. But hypnosis as we know it today was first associated with the work of an Austrian physician named Franz Anton Mesmer. In the 1700s, Mesmer believed that illnesses were caused by magnetic fluids in the body getting out of balance. He used magnets and other hypnotic techniques (the word “mesmerized” comes from his name) to treat people. But the medical community was not convinced. Mesmer was accused of fraud, and his techniques were called unscientific.

Hypnotherapy regained popularity in the mid-1900s due to Milton H. Erickson (1901 – 1980), a successful psychiatrist who used hypnosis in his practice. In 1958, both the American Medical Association and the American Psychological Association recognized hypnotherapy as a valid medical procedure. Since 1995, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has recommended hypnotherapy as a treatment for chronic pain.  Clinical hypnotherapy is now effectively used ito treat anxiety and and a broad range of addictive behavioral.

How Does Hypnotherapy Work?

When something happens to us, we remember it and learn a particular behavior in response to what happened. Each time something similar happens, our physical and emotional reactions attached to the memory are repeated. In some cases these reactions are unhealthy. In some forms of hypnotherapy, a trained therapist guides you to remember the event that led to the first reaction, separate the memory from the learned behavior, and replace unhealthy behaviors with new, healthier ones.

During hypnosis, your body relaxes and your thoughts become more focused. Like other relaxation techniques, hypnosis lowers blood pressure and heart rate, and changes certain types of brain wave activity. In this relaxed state, you will feel at ease physically yet fully awake mentally and may be highly responsive to suggestion. If you are trying to quit smoking, for example, a therapist’s suggestion may help convince you that you will not like the taste of cigarettes in the future. Some people respond better to hypnotic suggestion than others.

There are several stages of hypnosis:

  • Reframing the problem
  • Becoming relaxed, then absorbed (deeply engaged in the words or images presented by a hypnotherapist)
  • Dissociating (letting go of critical thoughts)
  • Responding (complying with a hypnotherapist’s suggestions)
  • Returning to usual awareness
  • Reflecting on the experience

What happens during Clinical Hypnotherapy

During your first visit, Dr. Lagerman will explain to you what hypnosis is and how it works. You will then be directed through relaxation techniques, using a series of mental images and suggestions intended to change behaviors and relieve symptoms. For example, people who have panic attacks may be given the suggestion that, in the future, they will be able to relax whenever they want. Each session lasts about an hour, and most people start to see results within 4 – 10 sessions.

What illnesses or conditions respond well to hypnosis?

Hypnosis is used in a variety of settings — from emergency rooms to dental offices to outpatient clinics. Clinical studies suggest that hypnosis may improve immune function, increase relaxation, decrease stress, and ease pain and feelings of anxiety.

Hypnotherapy can reduce the fear and anxiety that people experience when detoxing from alcohol and drugs.  Medically hypnosis may improve recovery time and reduce anxiety as well as pain following surgery. Clinical trials on burn patients suggest that hypnosis decreases pain (enough to replace pain medication) and speeds healing. Generally, clinical studies show that using hypnosis may reduce your need for medication, improve your mental and physical condition before an operation, and reduce the time it takes to recover. Dentists also use hypnotherapy to control gagging and bleeding.

Hypnotherapy can teach you self-regulation skills.  Clinical Hypnotherapy can help someone deal with the emotions and triggers that lead to relapse.  For instance, someone experiencing a trigger may learn to turn it down  like the volume on a radio. Hypnotherapy can also be used to help manage chronic illness. Self-hypnosis can enhance a sense of control, which is often lacking when someone has a chronic illness.

Other problems or conditions that may respond to hypnotherapy include:

  • Irritable bowel syndrome
  • Tension headaches
  • Alopecia areata
  • Asthma
  • Phobias
  • Insomnia
  • Addictions
  • Bedwetting
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Phobias
  • Labor and delivery
  • Skin disorders [such as acne, psoriasis, and eczema (atopic dermatitis)]
  • Stress
  • Tinnitus (ringing in the ears)
  • Cancer-related pain
  • Weight loss
  • Eating disorders
  • Warts
  • Indigestion (dyspepsia)

Posted in Treatment | Leave a comment

Definition of Recovery from Mental Disorders and Substance Abuse & Alcohol Disorders

A new working definition of recovery from mental disorders and substance use disorders is being announced by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The definition is the product of a year-long effort by SAMHSA and a wide range of partners in the behavioral health care community and other fields to develop a working definition of recovery that captures the essential, common experiences of those recovering from mental disorders and substance use disorders, along with major guiding principles that support the recovery definition.

The new working definition of Recovery from Mental Disorders and Substance Use Disorders is as follows:

A process of change through which individuals improve their health and wellness, live a self-directed life, and strive to reach their full potential.

“Over the years it has become increasingly apparent that a practical, comprehensive working definition of recovery would enable policy makers, providers, and others to better design, deliver, and measure integrated and holistic services to those in need,” said SAMHSA Administrator Pamela S. Hyde. ”By working with all elements of the behavioral health community and others to develop this definition, I believe SAMHSA has achieved a significant milestone in promoting greater public awareness and appreciation for the importance of recovery, and widespread support for the services that can make it a reality for millions of Americans.”

A major step in addressing this need occurred in August  2010 when SAMHSA convened a meeting of behavioral health leaders, consisting of mental health consumers and individuals in addiction recovery. Together these members of the behavioral health care community developed a draft definition and principles of recovery to reflect common elements of the recovery experience for those with mental disorders and/or substance use disorders.

In the months that have followed, SAMHSA worked with the behavioral health care community and other interested parties in reviewing drafts of the working recovery definition and principles with stakeholders at meetings, conferences and other venues. In August 2011, SAMHSA posted the working definition and principles that resulted from this process on the SAMHSA blog and invited comments from the public via SAMHSA Feedback Forums.  The blog post received 259 comments, and the forums had over 1000 participants, nearly 500 ideas, and over 1,200 comments on the ideas. Many of the comments received have been incorporated into the current working definition and principles.

Through the Recovery Support Strategic Initiative, SAMHSA has also delineated four major dimensions that support a life in recovery:

Health : overcoming or managing one’s disease(s) as well as living in a physically and emotionally healthy way;
Home:  a stable and safe place to live;
Purpose:  meaningful daily activities, such as a job, school, volunteerism, family caretaking, or creative endeavors, and the independence, income and resources to participate in society; and
Community : relationships and social networks that provide support, friendship, love, and hope.

 

Guiding Principles of Recovery

 Recovery emerges from hope:  The belief that recovery is real provides the essential and motivating message of a better future – that people can and do overcome the internal and external challenges, barriers, and obstacles that confront them.

Recovery is person-driven:  Self-determination and self-direction are the foundations for recovery as individuals define their own life goals and design their unique path(s).

Recovery occurs via many pathways:  Individuals are unique with distinct needs, strengths, preferences, goals, culture, and backgrounds ? including trauma experiences ? that affect and determine their pathway(s) to recovery. Abstinence is the safest approach for those with substance use disorders.

Recovery is holistic:  Recovery encompasses an individual’s whole life, including mind, body, spirit, and community. The array of services and supports available should be integrated and coordinated.

Recovery is supported by peers and allies: Mutual support and mutual aid groups, including the sharing of experiential knowledge and skills, as well as social learning, play an invaluable role in recovery

Recovery is supported through relationship and social networks:  An important factor in the recovery process is the presence and involvement of people who believe in the person’s ability to recover; who offer hope, support, and encouragement; and who also suggest strategies and resources for change.

Recovery is culturally-based and influenced : Culture and cultural background in all of its diverse representations ? including values, traditions, and beliefs ? are keys in determining a person’s journey and unique pathway to recovery.

Recovery is supported by addressing trauma : Services and supports should be trauma-informed to foster safety (physical and emotional) and trust, as well as promote choice, empowerment, and collaboration.

Recovery involves individual, family, and community strengths and responsibility:  Individuals, families, and communities have strengths and resources that serve as a foundation for recovery.

Recovery is based on respect  Community, systems, and societal acceptance and appreciation for people affected by mental health and substance use problems – including protecting their rights and eliminating discrimination – are crucial in achieving recovery.

For further detailed information about the new working recovery definition or the guiding principles of recovery please visit:  http://www.samhsa.gov/recovery/

 

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

Six Steps to Quitting Alcohol

1. It is important that you make the decision to stop drinking.  You have to want to quit drinking, and be ready to do it. If you are thinking of quitting because your spouse, your mother, your probation officer, or some other person wants you to do so, your chances of success are diminished. The more support that you have from your family and friends will definitely be very helpful, but you must be the one that is making the decision.  You must do it for yourself and not for others.  The bottom line is that when you improve your life, the lives of everyone around you will also improve.

2. Set your quit date, and stick with it.  It could be today, tomorrow, or the day after the Special Event that you’re already committed to attend next week. It might be a good idea to set a special date that is easy to remember, like your birthday. Any day is a good day to make a new beginning. Do not pick a date too far in the future. It would be a tragedy to have made the commitment to quit, only to kill someone (or yourself) by driving drunk before that date arrives. Contact Assisted Recovery for information on enrolling in one of our Pennsylvania Model programs. Set up an appointment to come in so that we can discuss with you the evidence based treatment options offered by Assisted Recovery.

3. When the “quit” date arrives, come to Assisted Recovery for a free consultation.  When you decide to enter the Assisted Recovery Pennsylvania Model program, you will be immediately seen (in most cases) by a program physician.  The program physician will evaluate your case and prescribe safe, effective, approved anti-alcohol medications, for example naltrexone and ondansetron.  The physician may also provide a prescription to assist in the detoxification from alcohol.

4. Recovery is a process, not an event.  You will need to put effort into this process.  Plan to attend one or more meetings weekly for at least one full year. Assisted Recovery meetings are positive, informative, and fun. We stress the biological, psychological, and social components of recovery from alcohol dependence, and provide a variety of tools to help you deal with each.

5. The individual therapy sessions provided by Assisted Recovery will help you to make the adjustment in your thinking, away from irrational bad decisions. Define the goals of your personal recovery, and begin working towards them. Abstinence from alcohol is not enough; it’s only the beginning of the process of recovery. In order to achieve a happy, healthy sobriety, you’ll have to do some work. Setting and achieving your goals in life will provide you with long-term happiness and satisfaction, which the quick-fix of alcohol promises, but never delivers.

6. Get on with the rest of your life. Our goal is to help you get to the point where you don’t need us anymore. But that doesn’t mean that you’re cured forever, and all your work is done. You will have arrested your current bout with alcohol dependence, but if you start drinking again you will probably become re-addicted. Maintaining your commitment to remain abstinent requires some effort. Recovery is like climbing up the down escalator: if you’re not working to move forward, you’re automatically sliding backwards. We will assist you in developing a long-term strategy for preventing a relapse, and our meetings are always open to those who wish to return. Helping others is an excellent way to help maintain your commitment.

If you are ready to quit drinking for good, Naltrexone and
Assisted Recovery will help you to do it.

 

Posted in Editorial | Leave a comment

Combined Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholism: Naltrexone & Ondansetron

Recent scientific and clinical interest in combining therapeutic agents for the treatment of alcoholism are based on the fact that derangement of multiple-neurotransmitter systems are likely to underlie biological predisposition to the disease. Thus, combining effective medications working at different neurotransmitters should produce a synergistic or at least an added clinical response. In animals, the combination of the 5-HT3 antagonist, ondansetron, and the mu receptor antagonist, naltrexone show synergism of action at reducing ethanol consumption. Alcoholics with an early onset of disease are effectively treated by ondansetron, and those with a family history of alcoholism in first degree relatives may have the best clinical outcome to treatment with naltrexone. Given that family history of alcoholism is associated with an early onset of disease, it reasonable for us to predict that the combination of ondansetron and naltrexone should be more optimal than either alone for the treatment of Early Onset Alcoholics (EOA). Indeed, preliminary clinical data from our group provide strong support that the medication combination is an effective treatment for EOA. We will test this hypothesis by comparing the effectiveness of ondansetron (4 mg/kg) and naltrexone(50 mg/day), both alone and in combination, in treating EOA vs. Late Onset Alcoholics (LOA) (total N of 45 subjects/cell x 8 cells = 360) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week (1 week of single-blind placebo followed by 11 weeks of the double-blind condition) outpatient clinical trial. All subjects will receive standardized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months post-treatment. Specifically, we predict that: 1) EOA, compared with LOA, will be more responsive to treatment with either ondansetron or naltrexone alone, and 2) that the combination of ondansetron and naltrexone will be superior to either medication alone in the treatment of EOA. We will have the unique opportunity to test with adequate power the secondary hypothesis that the combination of ondansetron and naltrexone will be better tolerated than naltrexone alone, thereby improving compliance. This is because nausea is an important side-effect of naltrexone which can limit compliance, and as shown in our preliminary study, ondansetron by having anti-nausea and anti-emetic properties counteracts this naltrexone side-effect. We support NIAAA’s mission to develop effective pharmacotherapies as adjuncts to psychotherapy for the treatment of alcoholism.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment